A. Role of Board of Trustees and President
Reappointments shall be made by the Board of Trustees upon the recommendations of the President. It is the purpose of these processes to provide the Board and the President with pertinent data on the basis of which to make such determinations.
B. Retention Policy and Collective Bargaining Agreement
The evaluation of professional staff shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this policy statement and the relevant provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Council of New Jersey State College Locals, NJSFT-AFT/AFL-CIO and the State of New Jersey.
By October 1 of each year, the President of the University, in consultation with the Local Union, shall establish and publish the schedule of times for the initiation/completion of the basic steps in the review and evaluation of professional staff eligible for multi-year appointment or reappointment contracts. Such schedule shall not violate any provision of the Agreement.
Each candidate for reappointment shall be provided with a timetable indicating the dates of the steps in the retention procedure. The timetable shall provide a reasonable opportunity for the candidate to present a written statement and/or materials for inclusion in the retention folder, prior to the beginning of the evaluation by the immediate supervisor.
D. Evaluation Forms
The Professional Staff Performance Appraisal Form (PSPAF), agreed to by the Union and Administration in February 2007, is available on-line through the University’s website and should be used for all professional staff appraisals. The form must be printed out and the hard copy signed by all parties involved. The only official form to be submitted is the signed hard copy. The forms are not to be submitted online.
E. Evaluation by Supervisors
1. Definition of Immediate Supervisor
For the purposes of evaluating professional staff, the immediate supervisor shall be construed as that supervisory, management-level person not included in the State College/ University negotiating unit who is first reached in the normal chain of command leading from the candidate .
2. Scope of Review
Owing to the nature of professional staff employment, it must be understood that the regular and continuous employment relationship between the employee and his immediate supervisor provides a climate for the sustained observation and assessment of the professional staff. A principal purpose of the annual process is to formalize, and share with the candidate for reappointment, conclusions which have been drawn during the regular working relationship.
The entire professional performance record of a member of the professional staff shall be considered at the time such employee is being considered for a multi-year appointment or reappointment contract. The candidate may include any additional material which he/ she deems appropriate. All items presented by the candidate for appointment or reappointment to a multi-year contract shall be considered in the evaluation process.
3. Additional Evaluations
Each member of the professional staff who is eligible for a multi-year appointment or reappointment contract may be evaluated by employees, who may be in or out of the bargaining unit, who serve in a regular and continuing functional working relationship to the candidate. Employees serving in a functional working relationship shall be those identified by the immediate supervisor of the candidate, after consultation with the candidate. The candidate's immediate supervisor shall request such identified employees to provide a written appraisal of the candidate's ability, performance, contributions, and potential. Where the candidate and the immediate supervisor, after consultation, disagree as to which employees serve in a functional working relationship to the candidate, the immediate supervisor and the candidate each will identify employees, if any, who serve in a functional relationship and the immediate supervisor will request written appraisals from all employees so identified.
All evaluations of the candidate prepared by him or herself and by employees serving in functional working relationships shall be submitted to the candidate's immediate supervisor, who shall see that the evaluation material is placed in the candidate's personnel file in accordance with the provisions of Article XXIX of the Agreement. The candidate's personnel file shall be available to the supervisor and other administrative officers for use in making their recommendations.
4. Interviews/Completion of Parts I-V of PSPAF
A. Before making a recommendation, the supervisor will complete Part I of the PSPAF (Professional Staff Performance Appraisal Form) and schedule an interview (meeting) with the candidate (employee) at a mutually convenient time. The purpose of this interview is to discuss Part I, II, III, and IV of the PSPAF.
B. Sufficient time shall be given for Parts II & III to be completed by the candidate and Part IV to be completed by the supervisor. At the initial interview, a second meeting between the candidate and supervisor shall be scheduled. At the second meeting, Parts II, III & IV, of the PSPAF shall be discussed and Part V (a) & (b) shall be completed collaboratively by both supervisor and candidate, as appropriate. At this meeting, the candidate shall also supply any support material to be included in the retention folder.
5. Summary Evaluation/Recommendation
After the second meeting, the immediate supervisor shall complete Part VI of the PSPAF. This recommendation/evaluation will be based on the interviews, PSPAF Parts I-V, any support material, and all material in the retention folder supplied by the candidate. The retention folder (which includes the PSPAF) will be given to the candidate for review.
F. Opportunity to Examine and Respond to Materials
The candidate will have the opportunity to review and respond to the evaluator’s signed/dated PSPAF and all materials in the retention folder. He or she shall be given reasonable time to complete this review/response and Part VII of the PSPAF. The retention folder (with completed PSPAF) will be returned to the immediate supervisor by the candidate.
G. Transmission to Higher Administrators
The retention folders will be transmitted by the immediate supervisors to the next higher level of administrators, who, in turn, will transmit them to the next higher level. This procedure will be continued until the folders are forwarded to the Provost or President. If at any level a non-reappointment or a reappointment with reservations/conditions is noted, the folder must be resubmitted to the candidate for review and response. Each higher-level administrator shall have an opportunity to review the folder and add his or her recommendation as appropriate. Once the Provost or President has signed and dated the PSPAF (Part X) a copy of the form shall be given to the candidate before it is filed with Human Resources.
H. Review Procedure
- A candidate who has received a negative recommendation from a supervisor may request an interview with the next higher-level supervisor to address the record. The candidate shall have the option to invite other persons from the collective bargaining unit to attend the meeting. If this option is to be exercised, the candidate shall notify the supervisor of this intention. Upon the exercise of this option, the supervisor shall also have the right to bring others of his or her choice to the meeting. The last date for requesting such a meeting shall be announced to the candidates and published in the timetable at the commencement of the academic year.
- A candidate who has been notified by the President of his or her intention not to recommend reappointment may request an interview with the President. If a candidate requests such an interview with the President, he or she shall have the option to invite other persons from the collective bargaining unit to attend the meeting. If the option to invite others to the meeting is exercised by the candidate, he or she shall so notify the President of this intention. Upon the exercise of such an option by the candidate, the President shall also have the right to include others of his or her choice in the meeting. The purpose of said interview shall be to afford the candidate a personal opportunity to comment on the record and/or to supply additional information prior to the President formulating his or her final recommendation to the Board of Trustees. The last date for requesting such an interview shall be announced to the candidates and published in the timetable at the commencement of the academic year.
- Any professional staff candidate for reappointment may submit to the Board of Trustees, in writing, new evidence or information or argumentation of inadequate consideration. The deadline for providing this information shall be announced and published in the timetable at the commencement of the academic year.
Grievances involving alleged violations of this policy and procedure must be filed within forty five (45) days from the date upon which such claimed violation took place or forty five (45) days from the date on which the candidate should have reasonably known of its occurrence.
J. Professional Staff Reclassification
If, as a result of the review of criteria with the immediate supervisor, an employee believes that a substantial change in job responsibilities has occurred, he or she may apply to the first level non-unit supervisor for a position reclassification review.